Two justices, two distinct philosophies—when Barrett and Jackson take the bench, their questions don’t just seek answers; they help shape the very future of constitutional law.
Fascinating! Any research into how the probing responses to oral arguments by Justices Barrett, Jackson and (one assumes) Kagan and Sotomayor, are viewed by the male Justices? Are they appreciated? Ignored? Discounted by the Old Boy Network?
Here is a previous paper I wrote that was published in a peer reviewed journal (SSRN has our previous working draft). It is statistical in nature but you can get the gist from the non-quant parts: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2906136
Fascinating! Any research into how the probing responses to oral arguments by Justices Barrett, Jackson and (one assumes) Kagan and Sotomayor, are viewed by the male Justices? Are they appreciated? Ignored? Discounted by the Old Boy Network?
Here is a previous paper I wrote that was published in a peer reviewed journal (SSRN has our previous working draft). It is statistical in nature but you can get the gist from the non-quant parts: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2906136