As to the Samsung case — my mind stopped; it’s like watching an uncaptioned film where everyone speaks calculus, fascinating but incomprehensible (at least to me).
Trying to keep things diverse. Hopefully this column will fill some folks interest that are invested in the cases or courts and others by exposing them to content they might otherwise miss.
The AP decision: A Pyrrhic victory? As you note, the AP can return to the White House press corps … but there’s no guarantee they’ll be noticed, much less called on.
That this case had to be brought at all, is extraordinary: The First Amendment right of free speech, is baked into American jurisprudence; a president should not be able to ignore the Constitution to protect his hurt feelings.
Still, Judge McFadden wisely avoided political commentary (unlike me) = less likely to be reversed.
As to the Samsung case — my mind stopped; it’s like watching an uncaptioned film where everyone speaks calculus, fascinating but incomprehensible (at least to me).
Trying to keep things diverse. Hopefully this column will fill some folks interest that are invested in the cases or courts and others by exposing them to content they might otherwise miss.
Noble …
Thanks
A new - and welcome - addition to the Legalytics arsenal—congratulations!
The AP decision: A Pyrrhic victory? As you note, the AP can return to the White House press corps … but there’s no guarantee they’ll be noticed, much less called on.
That this case had to be brought at all, is extraordinary: The First Amendment right of free speech, is baked into American jurisprudence; a president should not be able to ignore the Constitution to protect his hurt feelings.
Still, Judge McFadden wisely avoided political commentary (unlike me) = less likely to be reversed.